data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2d4b/b2d4b1d6c511a052dbe14e99a040413d8a41080f" alt=""
Sunday, January 11, 2009
Art History Schlock
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2d4b/b2d4b1d6c511a052dbe14e99a040413d8a41080f" alt=""
Colonial kitsch
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d823a/d823a0983b3995857a03be4d94afddf53c869893" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68378/683787ab9cbb19e0fb834772b33cacefb926059f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72511/7251149da54aca33c5cce7b78d3c723b7895f86b" alt=""
The table cloth depicts not only Island products - pinneaples, coffee, tobacco, but also US military bases, including the ones recently and thankfully removed from Vieques Island. US soldiers are shown doing military exercises. But what fascinates me the most are the historical parallels created by US imperialism and the Columbus' "discovery" of the Island. Three key moments of invasion are conflated - Columbus' arrival, the entry of US troops on the Island when they invaded in 1898, and the activities of the US army in bases at the time the table cloth was produced. I wonder who was buying this type of object, I assume it was US tourists going to the Island, eating macaroni and cheese on Sunday with their kids, a "Leave it to Beaver" suburban scenario, did they notice the violence depicted in their quotidian object?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)